Section II will investigate biased understandings of the arranged marriage in more detail, by critically evaluating the binary approach in scholarly literature, illustrated further by a study of a variety of categorizations and close interpretation of definitions on the arranged marriage. This article is set up in three sections. At its core, this article hopes to contribute to an understanding of the arranged marriage from an unbiased lens. 2 This will enable judging the arranged marriage on the qualities and rewards it holds for its practitioners. There is a necessity to study the arranged marriage on its own terms and not in a binary with the autonomous marriage.
Measured this way, the arranged marriage turns into something faulty. Monitoring the arranged marriage as if it were or should be autonomous, emphasizes defects, deficits, lacunas in the arranged marriage on matters related to autonomy. However, the arranged marriage, even in its most modern manifestation, is not an autonomous marriage. The arranged marriage is then measured by characteristics typical of the autonomous marriage system. Resulting from this, the autonomous marriage sets the standards of an ideal marriage all marriages must aim for, including the arranged marriage. The autonomous marriage, thriving on individual choice, is perceived to be the ideal marital system, while the arranged marriage, supported by traditional kin authority, is not considered ideal. From this binary, both marital systems are not viewed neutrally. 1 While a comparison of the arranged marriage to the autonomous marriage should be an unbiased one, the contrary is true. In this literature the arranged marriage is compared in a binary to the autonomous marriage. There is a tendency in academic literature to view the arranged marriage from the lens of the autonomous marriage. As such, this study hugely contributes to an unbiased understanding of the arranged marriage and changing arranged marriage patterns and is a valuable reading for those interested in marriage, marital systems and the future thereof. The author argues that it is vital to first understand the traditional structures of the arranged marriage, before one can understand modernizing tendencies the arranged marriage system is currently undergoing. This analysis highlights and critically examines social principles fundamental to the arranged marriage system and which are much misunderstood, such as hierarchy, patriarchy, collectivism, group loyalty and the role of parental and individual marital consent. While this analysis zooms in on the case study of one particular focus group, the British Pakistani diaspora, it reveals broad insights into the arranged marriage system in general. Readers are invited to an in-depth and rigorous analysis of the foundations upon which the arranged marriage system rests. The author encourages readers to break this frame and offers a neutral perspective on this traditional marital system practised by billions around the world. As a result, the arranged marriage is perceived to be a “marriage of shortcomings”, one that fails to meet the standards of the free-choice marriage system.
Love marriage vs arranged marriage free#
It considers the free choice marriage to be the ideal. Instead, the arranged marriage is often analysed through the lens of the modern free choice marriage system.
Love marriage vs arranged marriage full#
This research asks one simple question, a question many studies on the arranged marriage omit to ask, namely “What exactly is the arranged marriage?” Author Naema Tahir, born and bred in the arranged marriage culture, but educated in the free-choice marriage culture, argues that much literature on the arranged marriage fails to offer full exploration of this traditional marital system.
0 kommentar(er)
